DISGUSTING: Leftist Writer Asks "Do White Men Really Deserve to Vote?"

DISGUSTING: Leftist Writer Asks "Do White Men Really Deserve to Vote?"

The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds. It's not enough that pre-approved minority groups like the LGBT, blacks and hispanics (but apparently not asians) must be given preferential treatment in all aspects of society, while whites must be deliberately suppressed.

Last week, leftist writer Malia Rolt put out a piece for Affinity Magazine in which she blatantly supported anti-white racism:

Last time a journalist dared to use their platform and freedom of speech to discuss this question on the Huffington Post, she was silenced and the article was taken down. However, I saw it and thought that the benefits of reversing white men’s suffrage was definitely worth discussing. After all, women and people of colour went through times of not being allowed to vote, and the fact that white men never had to experience that is an injustice. Despite the fact that we are given the illusion of democracy today (even though in reality the electoral college decides our future for us), do oppressors of minorities and women deserve to choose to continue our oppression, or should we help them by withdrawing the right to vote from them for a while until we can truly get on the same page and connect?

There are several issues with Rolt's positions:

  • Racism is still racism even if it's directed at white people.
  • America has never been a democracy — historically, it's always been a republic. This is what the founding fathers intended, as they were fearful of the dangers of a pure democracy.
  • The electoral college was designed to avoid mob-rule. This is why 48.2% of the country can want a criminal liar in office, but not actually succeed by sheer numbers.

Rolt goes on to make the case that women and blacks didn't originally have equal voting rights, and since then have not received "reparations," as if the white men of today had anything to do with the decisions made between 1860-1920.

Then there's this steaming pile:

Historically, white men have had few problems voting and the way things are going, they will never understand the kind of injustice others have faced.

Now, history lessons aside; many people who disagree so far might be thinking, “Yes, all this injustice that happened in the past was undoubtedly awful. However, two wrongs don’t make a right.” However one can’t be sure if withdrawing the white man’s vote could be considered a “wrong”.

One can't be sure if deliberately withdrawing someone's right to vote based on their skin color is wrong? We'd ask Rolt to get a mental evaluation, but apparently she's terminally leftist.

The article ends with this:

White men who want to become better allies always come across the problem of “I will never understand what it feels like to be systemically oppressed” but this proposal may further their understanding of minority needs and improve relations between different genders and races, which is the ultimate goal; equality.

This is the left's insanity exposed for the world to see — until you have been systematically oppressed yourself, you will never understand or be able to do anything about systematic oppression. The only way to "equality" is deliberate inequality, and if you disagree, you're next.

Stay alert. Stay alive.

Down But Not Out: Google Employee Fired Over Free Speech May File Lawsuit

Down But Not Out: Google Employee Fired Over Free Speech May File Lawsuit

WUT: Fake-Conservative Jeff Flake Says Being Conservative Isn't Actually About Being Conservative

WUT: Fake-Conservative Jeff Flake Says Being Conservative Isn't Actually About Being Conservative